Part 2: Distributed Node-Based Logical Architecture

Go to The FX Demo Root

Part 2 defines the platform-independent logical architecture for the Financial Systems Archetype. It describes the logical nodes, runtime planes, information flows, responsibilities, and separation-of-concerns rules that apply before any specific technology stack is introduced into the architecture. Part 2 introduces the logical model that implementation profiles map onto selected platforms, products, protocols, and deployment environments. It serves as the primary bridge between the conceptual architecture in Part 1 and the technology-specific implementation profiles in later parts.

* Part 2: Distributed Node-Based Logical Architecture / PIM

• Foreword
• Introduction
• 1. Scope
• 2. Relationship to Part 0 and Part 1
• 3. Traceability to Parent and Source Architectures

  • 3.1 Traceability to SIP-RA
  • 3.2 Alignment with FDIS-RA
  • 3.3 Traceability to Part 1 Conceptual Architecture
  • 3.4 Coverage of the Original FX Demo Reference Architecture
  • 3.5 Traceability Position
• 4. Logical Architecture Principles

  • 4.1 Distributed Node-Based Architecture
  • 4.2 Explicit Communication over Implicit Coupling
  • 4.3 Platform Independence
  • 4.4 Logical Separation of Runtime Planes
  • 4.5 Explicit Information Structures
  • 4.6 Traceability from Concept to Logical Model
  • 4.7 Evidence-Oriented Logical Design
• 5. Logical Architecture Overview

  • 5.1 Overview
  • 5.2 Logical Architecture Context
  • 5.3 Distributed Logical Node Network
  • 5.4 Logical Communication Model
  • 5.5 Logical Information Model
  • 5.6 Logical Runtime Plane Model
  • 5.7 Logical Traceability Model
• 6. Logical Node Model

  • 6.1 Overview
  • 6.2 Logical Node
  • 6.3 Logical Node Identity
  • 6.4 Logical Node Role
  • 6.5 Logical Node Responsibility
  • 6.6 Logical Node Boundary
  • 6.7 Logical Node Collaboration
  • 6.8 Logical Node Lifecycle State
• 7. Logical Communication Model

  • 7.1 Overview
  • 7.2 Logical Communication Endpoint
  • 7.3 Communication Role
  • 7.4 Publisher Role
  • 7.5 Subscriber Role
  • 7.6 Requester Role
  • 7.7 Responder Role
  • 7.8 Command Producer Role
  • 7.9 Command Consumer Role
  • 7.10 Event Producer Role
  • 7.11 Event Consumer Role
  • 7.12 Communication Direction and Coupling
  • 7.13 Communication Pattern Independence
• 8. Logical Information Model

  • 8.1 Overview
  • 8.2 Logical Data Structure Definition
  • 8.3 Logical Data Structure Instance
  • 8.4 Logical Message
  • 8.5 Logical Event
  • 8.6 Logical Command
  • 8.7 Logical Acknowledgement
  • 8.8 Logical Assertion
  • 8.9 Logical Record
  • 8.10 Logical Information Lineage
• 9. Logical Runtime Plane Model

  • 9.1 Overview
  • 9.2 Logical Control Plane
  • 9.3 Logical Data Plane
  • 9.4 Logical Health and Observability Plane
  • 9.5 Logical Policy and Release Plane
  • 9.6 Logical Audit and Provenance Plane
  • 9.7 Cross-Plane Logical Relationships
• 10. Logical Interaction Patterns

  • 10.1 Overview
  • 10.2 Register Node
  • 10.3 Report Node Status
  • 10.4 Publish Domain Information
  • 10.5 Subscribe to Domain Information
  • 10.6 Issue Control Command
  • 10.7 Acknowledge Control Command
  • 10.8 Request Policy Decision
  • 10.9 Record Audit and Provenance
  • 10.10 Replay or Reconstruct Information
  • 10.11 Logical Interaction Pattern Summary
• 11. Logical Governance Model

  • 11.1 Overview
  • 11.2 Logical Ownership of Definitions
  • 11.3 Logical Versioning
  • 11.4 Logical Compatibility
  • 11.5 Logical Change Control
  • 11.6 Logical Admission Rules
  • 11.7 Logical Policy Constraints
• 12. Logical Traceability Model

  • 12.1 Overview
  • 12.2 Part 1 Concept to Part 2 Logical Element
  • 12.3 Logical Node Traceability
  • 12.4 Logical Endpoint Traceability
  • 12.5 Logical Data Structure Traceability
  • 12.6 Logical Runtime Plane Traceability
  • 12.7 Logical Interaction Traceability
  • 12.8 Logical Evidence Traceability
  • 12.9 Logical Traceability Summary
• 13. Relationship to Domain Logical Profiles

  • 13.1 Overview
  • 13.2 How Domain Profiles Specialise the Logical Architecture
  • 13.3 Domain Profile Additions
  • 13.4 What Domain Profiles Preserve
  • 13.5 Relationship to the FX Demo Logical Profile
  • 13.6 Boundary Between Part 2 and Domain Logical Profiles
• 14. Relationship to Implementation Profiles / PSM

  • 14.1 Overview
  • 14.2 Logical Elements Prepared for Technology Mapping
  • 14.3 Communication Technology Independence
  • 14.4 Data Representation Independence
  • 14.5 Execution and Deployment Independence
  • 14.6 Implementation Mapping Boundaries
  • 14.7 Relationship to Phase 0 Implementation Profile
  • 14.8 Boundary Between Part 2 and Implementation Profiles
• 15. Logical Rules and Constraints

  • 15.1 Overview
  • 15.2 Logical Nodes Remain Distinct from Runtime Deployments
  • 15.3 Logical Endpoints Remain Distinct from Communication Technologies
  • 15.4 Logical Data Structures Remain Distinct from Serialisation Formats
  • 15.5 Logical Runtime Planes Remain Distinct from Implementation Groupings
  • 15.6 Logical Interactions Remain Traceable
  • 15.7 Logical Architecture Does Not Prescribe Deployment Topology
  • 15.8 Logical Architecture Does Not Prescribe Communication Pattern Implementation
  • 15.9 Logical Architecture Does Not Prescribe Governance Tooling
  • 15.10 Domain Profiles Preserve the Logical Architecture
  • 15.11 Implementation Profiles Preserve the Logical Architecture
  • 15.12 Logical Constraints Summary
• 16. Logical Requirements

  • 16.1 Overview
  • 16.2 Distributed Node-Based Architecture Requirements
  • 16.3 Logical Node Requirements
  • 16.4 Logical Communication Requirements
  • 16.5 Logical Information Requirements
  • 16.6 Logical Runtime Plane Requirements
  • 16.7 Logical Interaction Requirements
  • 16.8 Logical Governance Requirements
  • 16.9 Logical Traceability Requirements
  • 16.10 Profile and Implementation Boundary Requirements