FR-MC-001 — Cloud Provider Abstraction
Statement
Crucible SHALL provide Cloud Provider Abstraction.
Derived From
This requirement derives from:
-
Crucible System Requirements Specification, Version 1.1 Draft, Functional Requirements, FR-MC-001
The Original Requirement states:
The system shall support cloud provider abstraction.[C1]
FR-MC-001:
-
Replaces The system with the defined system name Crucible
-
Changes shall to the established uppercase normative form SHALL
-
Replaces the weak verb support with provide
-
Capitalizes Cloud Provider Abstraction as the named architectural capability
No other substantive normalization is required.
Rationale
Cloud providers expose different resource types, service identifiers, configuration parameters, identity models, network models, storage models, regions, interfaces, and operational constraints.
Cloud Provider Abstraction allows deployment information that expresses common intent to remain separate from parameters required by a particular Cloud Provider.
This separation reduces provider coupling and supports reuse of deployment information across Provider Implementations.
This requirement does not require every deployment capability to have an identical representation across Cloud Providers. Provider-specific extensions can represent capabilities that do not have a common provider-independent representation.
Applies To
This requirement applies to:
-
Cloud Provider Abstraction
-
Cloud deployment information
-
Cloud-provider-specific parameters
Verification
Verification confirms that:
-
A tested deployment contains information that expresses deployment intent
-
Crucible separates the tested deployment intent from parameters required by a particular Cloud Provider
-
A provider-specific parameter can change without requiring modification of unrelated provider-independent deployment information
-
The observed behavior demonstrates Cloud Provider Abstraction
Referenced By
The following pages reference this requirement:
Implementation Status
Implemented and Verified
Requirement Status
Review and approve FR-MC-001 as a leaf requirement.
Issues
Determine whether Cloud Provider Abstraction requires a controlled definition in the shared Terms and Definitions corpus.
Determine whether separate requirements define the boundary between provider-independent deployment information and provider-specific parameters.
Notes for Editors
This requirement page retains the stable requirement identifier FR-MC-001.
This page is a leaf requirement page and omits a trailing :start from its namespace.
The Statement preserves the approved source intent by requiring Crucible to provide Cloud Provider Abstraction.
Do not add provider substitution, cross-provider deployment, identical provider capabilities, Hybrid-Cloud Deployment, Edge Deployment, or provider-specific extension obligations unless the controlling requirement changes through an approved requirements process.
To reference this requirement Statement from another wiki page, insert:
{{section>dido:02-crusible:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:03-functional-requirements:03-04-multi-cloud-management:fr-mc-001#Statement&noheader&nofooter&noeditbtn}}
© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.