The Submission SHALL describe the lifecycle Governance mechanisms applicable to structural, semantic, and interpretive Artifacts and the architectural mechanisms by which each Jurisdiction retains Authority over structural and semantic definitions within its operational boundary.
Structural, semantic, and interpretive Artifacts may evolve under different authorities, schedules, policies, and lifecycle processes. The Submission must explain how those Artifacts are identified, versioned, reviewed, approved, applied, deprecated, and superseded.
The architecture must also preserve the ability of each Jurisdiction to govern the structural and semantic definitions applicable within its operational boundary. Participation in cross-jurisdictional operations must not silently transfer that Authority or impose another Jurisdiction’s definitions without an authorized Governance decision.
A conforming Submission demonstrates that:
The description includes the architectural information governed by:
SIP-053 governs the required Governance and jurisdictional Authority description. The requirements listed under Required Coverage govern the underlying lifecycle and jurisdictional capabilities.
This requirement does not assign Authority to SIP-RA or prescribe which organization governs a particular structural or semantic definition. It requires the proposed Reference Architecture to represent and preserve the applicable Authority.
Use the following syntax to include the authoritative Statement on another wiki page:
{{section>public:00-sip-ra:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:sip-053-governance-and-jurisdictional-authority-description#Statement&noheader&nofooter&noeditbtn}}
© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.