Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:qualified_node [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:qualified_node [2026/08/06 10:47] (current) – nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Qualified Node ====== | ||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The qualification criteria address the characteristics relevant to the governed function. These characteristics include applicable interface, [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Qualification supports trust, provider comparison, [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Qualification also supports competition among implementations. Different Nodes compete to perform the same governed function when each Node satisfies the applicable qualification criteria and produces the required Evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The qualification record identifies: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The Qualified Node | ||
| + | * The governed function | ||
| + | * The applicable qualification criteria | ||
| + | * The operating context | ||
| + | * The applicable jurisdiction | ||
| + | * The qualifying [[dido: | ||
| + | * The qualification method | ||
| + | * The supporting Evidence | ||
| + | * The qualification date | ||
| + | * The validity period | ||
| + | * Any limitations or conditions | ||
| + | * The applicable [[dido: | ||
| + | * The applicable [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A material change to the Node, its Configuration, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Financial Systems Archetype, Part 6: Cost Recovery, Compensation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Financial Systems Archetype, Part 7: Governed Node Service Market | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Qualified Node differs from a running Node: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A running Node has an operational presence | ||
| + | * A Qualified Node has recognized eligibility for a defined governed function, scope, and operating context | ||
| + | |||
| + | Qualification establishes eligibility to perform governed work. Qualification does not establish that the Qualified Node completed a particular item of work. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Evidence of completed work supports attribution, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Qualification applies only within its defined scope, operating context, validity period, and conditions. Qualification for one governed function does not establish qualification for another governed function. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An authorized qualification process evaluates a sanctions-screening Node against the policy, Evidence, residency, Security, interface, and service-level criteria applicable within a defined jurisdiction. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The resulting qualification record identifies the Node, governed function, jurisdiction, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Node is a Qualified Node for sanctions-screening work within that defined scope. The qualification does not establish that the Node completed any particular sanctions-screening request. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||