| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |
| fxdemo:07-part:11-market-integrity-controls:11-4-appeal-and-review:start [2026/07/11 11:15] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | fxdemo:07-part:11-market-integrity-controls:11-4-appeal-and-review:start [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 |
|---|
| An appeal requests reconsideration of a decision that affects market participation, qualification, eligibility, assignment, compensation, suspension, removal, or restoration. A review examines the records, rules, evidence, and decision basis associated with the contested action. The review process should identify the applicable Governance Rules, the affected participant, the affected Qualified Service Provider or Qualified Node, the affected governed function, the relevant Qualification Profile, the relevant Qualification Evidence, assignment records, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:w:work_performed_event| Work Performed Events]], [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence_reference| Evidence References]], Non-Performance Indicators, Compensation Claims, Settlement Instructions, and supporting decision records. | An appeal requests reconsideration of a decision that affects market participation, qualification, eligibility, assignment, compensation, suspension, removal, or restoration. A review examines the records, rules, evidence, and decision basis associated with the contested action. The review process should identify the applicable Governance Rules, the affected participant, the affected Qualified Service Provider or Qualified Node, the affected governed function, the relevant Qualification Profile, the relevant Qualification Evidence, assignment records, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:w:work_performed_event| Work Performed Events]], [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence_reference| Evidence References]], Non-Performance Indicators, Compensation Claims, Settlement Instructions, and supporting decision records. |
| |
| Appeal and Review do not require unrestricted disclosure of transaction content, full evidence payloads, proprietary logic, confidential business information, or protected jurisdictional information. Reviewability may rely on Evidence References, classification metadata, governed records, authorised evidence views, and role-based access when Content Minimisation applies. | Appeal and Review do not require unrestricted disclosure of transaction content, full evidence payloads, proprietary logic, confidential business information, or protected jurisdictional information. Reviewability may rely on Evidence References, classification metadata, governed records, authorized evidence views, and role-based access when Content Minimization applies. |
| |
| Appeal and Review also support restoration. A suspended participant, Qualified Service Provider, Qualified Node, governed function, or Qualification Profile may regain eligibility when the review process recognises correction, updated evidence, renewed qualification, governance approval, or successful dispute resolution. | Appeal and Review also support restoration. A suspended participant, Qualified Service Provider, Qualified Node, governed function, or Qualification Profile may regain eligibility when the review process recognises correction, updated evidence, renewed qualification, governance approval, or successful dispute resolution. |