Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- fxdemo:02-part:15-logical-rules-and-constraints:15-9-logical-architecture-does-not-prescribe-governance-tooling:start [2026/07/11 11:07] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
+++ fxdemo:02-part:15-logical-rules-and-constraints:15-9-logical-architecture-does-not-prescribe-governance-tooling:start [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[fxdemo:02-part:start | Go To Top ]]
-The Logical Governance Model defines ownership, versioning, compatibility, change control, admission rules, and [[fxdemo:dido_99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_policy_constraints|policy constraints]] at the logical level.
+The Logical Governance Model defines ownership, versioning, compatibility, change control, admission rules, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_policy_constraints|policy constraints]] at the logical level.
 It does not prescribe a repository, workflow tool, requirements management system, policy engine, rules engine, access control product, ticketing system, approval process, or configuration service.
-Governance and implementation profiles select the mechanisms that realise logical governance. Those mechanisms support governance; they do not define the Logical Governance Model.
+Governance and implementation profiles select the mechanisms that realize logical governance. Those mechanisms support governance; they do not define the Logical Governance Model.
 ----