This is an old revision of the document!
3.2 Alignment with FDIS-RA
FDIS-RA provides financial-domain architectural precedent for systems that Interpret, validate, compare, and govern regulated Data. The Financial Systems Archetype aligns with FDIS-RA by treating meaning, Interpretation, validation, provenance, comparability, and Evidence as architectural concerns rather than implementation by-products.
FDIS-RA does not replace SIP-RA as the parent Reference Architecture (RA). Instead, FDIS-RA informs the financial-domain interpretation concerns that the Financial Systems Archetype must preserve.
Part 1 uses FDIS-RA as an alignment source for the following conceptual concerns.
Table 3-2: FDIS-RA concerns aligned with the Conceptual Architecture
| FDIS-RA concern | Part 1 treatment |
|---|---|
| Semantic Interpretation as an architectural concern | Defines Semantics, Interpretation, and governance of meaning as conceptual concerns. |
| Separation of Evidence, observation, Interpretation, validation, and analytical consumption | Defines separation of concerns and Runtime Plane concepts. |
| Traceability and Evidence | Defines Traceability and Evidence as core conceptual elements. |
| Auditability and defensibility | Treats Evidence as an architectural concern rather than a test by-product. |
| Comparability across systems and time | Preserves conceptual meaning independently from implementation technology. |
| Technology neutrality | Avoids binding conceptual architecture to specific products, tools, languages, middleware, or deployment platforms. |
| Long-term governance of meaning | Defines governance of meaning as a conceptual architecture principle. |