dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:u:under-compliance

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:u:under-compliance [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:u:under-compliance [2026/07/11 11:15] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Under-Compliance ======
 +
 +[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:start|Return to Terms and Definitions]]
 +
 +===== Discussion =====
 +
 +Under-Compliance occurs when a participant, Node, or implementation performs work that is less governed than the applicable obligation requires. In the FX Demo Reference Architecture, under-compliance affects cost comparisons because an implementation that omits required work appears less expensive than one that performs the required work and records the required evidence.
 +
 +Under-Compliance differs from efficient compliant processing. Efficient compliant processing reduces cost while satisfying the same semantic, policy, evidence, security, residency, sovereignty, operational, and service-level obligations. Under-compliance reduces apparent cost by omitting, weakening, or failing to evidence required governed work.
 +
 +The Cost Recovery, Compensation, and Settlement Plane helps identify under-compliance by comparing required governed work with available work records, qualification records, cost records, and evidence references.
 +
 +===== Definition =====
 +
 +//failure to satisfy an applicable obligation for governed work//
 +
 +===== Source =====
 +
 +FX Demo Reference Architecture, Part 6: Cost Recovery, Compensation, and Settlement Plane
 +
 +===== Note =====
 +
 +Under-Compliance differs from non-performance. Non-performance indicates the absence of required work or evidence. Under-compliance also includes incomplete work, weakened controls, insufficient evidence, or work that fails to satisfy the applicable obligation.
 +
 +Under-Compliance does not by itself establish misconduct. Governance, audit, regulatory, contractual, or remediation processes determine cause, responsibility, and consequence.
 +
 +
 +===== Example =====
 +
 +An FX transaction requires fraud screening, sanctions checking, and evidence retention. A provider performs fraud screening and sanctions checking but omits evidence retention. The provider appears less expensive than a provider that performs all three functions. The omitted evidence retention represents Under-Compliance.