| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision |
| dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:qualified_node [2026/07/11 11:15] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:qualified_node [2026/08/06 10:47] (current) – nick_dido |
|---|
| ====== Qualified Node ====== | ====== Qualified Node ====== |
| |
| [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:start|Return to Terms and Definitions]] | [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:start|Go up to Terms and Definitions]] |
| |
| ===== Discussion ===== | ===== Discussion ===== |
| |
| A Qualified Node performs governed work after the architecture recognises its eligibility for a defined function. Qualification supports trust, cost attribution, provider comparison, compensation, and settlement in the Cost Recovery, Compensation, and Settlement Plane. | A [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:n:node|Node]] becomes a Qualified Node when an authorized qualification process determines that the Node satisfies the criteria applicable to a defined governed function, scope, and operating context. |
| |
| A Qualified Node satisfies the relevant interface, semantic, policy, evidence, security, residency, sovereignty, operational, and service-level criteria for a defined work type. Qualification prevents the architecture from treating an unverified or unsuitable Node as eligible for compensation. | The qualification criteria address the characteristics relevant to the governed function. These characteristics include applicable interface, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:s:semantic|semantic]], policy, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]], [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:s:security|Security]], residency, sovereignty, operational, and service-level criteria. |
| |
| A Qualified Node also supports competition among implementations. Different Nodes can compete to perform the same governed function when each Node satisfies the same qualification criteria and produces the required evidence. | Qualification supports trust, provider comparison, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:cost|Cost]] attribution, compensation eligibility, and settlement. It prevents an unverified or unsuitable Node from receiving authorization or compensation for governed work. |
| | |
| | Qualification also supports competition among implementations. Different Nodes compete to perform the same governed function when each Node satisfies the applicable qualification criteria and produces the required Evidence. |
| | |
| | The qualification record identifies: |
| | |
| | * The Qualified Node |
| | * The governed function |
| | * The applicable qualification criteria |
| | * The operating context |
| | * The applicable jurisdiction |
| | * The qualifying [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:authority|Authority]] |
| | * The qualification method |
| | * The supporting Evidence |
| | * The qualification date |
| | * The validity period |
| | * Any limitations or conditions |
| | * The applicable [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:v:version|Version]] |
| | * The applicable [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:configuration|Configuration]] |
| | |
| | A material change to the Node, its Configuration, its operating context, or the applicable qualification criteria initiates the defined review or requalification process. |
| |
| ===== Definition ===== | ===== Definition ===== |
| |
| //Node recognised as eligible to perform a defined governed function// | //[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:n:node|Node]] determined by an authorized qualification process to satisfy the criteria applicable to a defined governed function, scope, and operating context// |
| |
| ===== Source ===== | ===== Source ===== |
| |
| FX Demo Reference Architecture, Part 6: Cost Recovery, Compensation, and Settlement Plane | Financial Systems Archetype, Part 6: Cost Recovery, Compensation, and Settlement Plane |
| | |
| | Financial Systems Archetype, Part 7: Governed Node Service Market |
| |
| ===== Note ===== | ===== Note ===== |
| |
| A Qualified Node differs from a running Node. A running Node has operational presence. A Qualified Node has recognised eligibility for a defined governed function. | A Qualified Node differs from a running Node: |
| |
| Qualification supports compensation eligibility but does not by itself prove that the Node completed a specific item of work. | * A running Node has an operational presence |
| | * A Qualified Node has recognized eligibility for a defined governed function, scope, and operating context |
| | |
| | Qualification establishes eligibility to perform governed work. Qualification does not establish that the Qualified Node completed a particular item of work. |
| | |
| | Evidence of completed work supports attribution, compensation, and settlement for that item of work. |
| | |
| | Qualification applies only within its defined scope, operating context, validity period, and conditions. Qualification for one governed function does not establish qualification for another governed function. |
| |
| ===== Example ===== | ===== Example ===== |
| |
| A sanctions screening Node satisfies the required policy, evidence, residency, security, and service-level criteria for sanctions screening in a defined jurisdiction. The architecture treats that Node as a Qualified Node for sanctions screening work. | An authorized qualification process evaluates a sanctions-screening Node against the policy, Evidence, residency, Security, interface, and service-level criteria applicable within a defined jurisdiction. |
| | |
| | The resulting qualification record identifies the Node, governed function, jurisdiction, Configuration, Version, validity period, applicable criteria, and supporting Evidence. |
| | |
| | The Node is a Qualified Node for sanctions-screening work within that defined scope. The qualification does not establish that the Node completed any particular sanctions-screening request. |
| | |
| | ---- |
| |
| | <WRAP centeralign> |
| | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. |
| | </WRAP> |