This is an old revision of the document!
MO-001
Statement
Crucible SHALL create Infrastructure Environments that satisfy the applicable acceptance criteria for deployment time, Reproducibility, security, and compliance.
Source Statement
Crucible SHALL enable rapid creation of repeatable, compliant, and secure infrastructure environments.
Source
Crucible System Requirements Specification, Version 1.1 Draft, Mission Objectives, MO-001.
Assessment
The source statement preserves the approved mission objective but does not express a fully testable requirement.
The following Specification Discipline and Authoring findings apply:
-
Enable is a weak verb that describes facilitation rather than the behavior Crucible performs
-
Rapid does not identify a duration, threshold, baseline, or comparison method
-
Repeatable does not identify the controlled inputs or comparison criteria required to determine equivalence
-
Compliant does not identify the applicable compliance baseline or acceptance criteria
-
Secure does not identify the applicable security baseline or required security controls
-
The source statement combines deployment time, reproducibility, security, and compliance into one compound objective
The normalized Statement replaces the weak verb and undefined qualifiers with a direct action and references to applicable acceptance criteria.
Rationale
Organizations often require substantial manual effort to construct Infrastructure Environments, apply security configurations, perform compliance assessments, and reproduce the resulting environments.
Crucible reduces this effort by coordinating:
-
Declarative configuration
-
Reusable Baselines
-
Machine Image construction
-
Compliance assessment
-
Evidence generation
The Security Plane governs the application and verification of security controls throughout these activities.
Controlled and repeatable workflows support Reproducibility, security control application, compliance evaluation, and consistent environment creation across connected and disconnected operational contexts.
Applies To
This requirement applies to:
-
Machine Image construction
-
Compliance assessment
-
CI/CD Pipeline integration
-
Operational Lifecycle management
Verification
-
Verification SHALL confirm that Crucible creates an Infrastructure Environment from controlled declarative inputs and reusable Baselines
-
Verification SHALL confirm that environment creation satisfies the deployment time acceptance criteria defined for the applicable test
-
Verification SHALL confirm that repeated execution with equivalent controlled inputs produces equivalent Infrastructure Environments according to defined comparison criteria
-
Verification SHALL confirm that the workflow applies the security controls required by the selected security baseline
-
Verification SHALL confirm that the resulting environment satisfies the acceptance criteria defined by the selected compliance baseline
-
Verification SHALL confirm that each identified Compliance Finding is recorded in the applicable compliance output
Verification may include:
-
Baseline Composition tests
-
Machine Image build tests
-
Compliance scan tests
-
Evidence generation tests
-
Repeated build comparisons
-
Repeated deployment comparisons
-
Connected and disconnected workflow demonstrations
-
End-to-end CI/CD Pipeline tests
The verification record SHALL identify:
-
The controlled inputs
-
The applicable deployment time acceptance criteria
-
The environment comparison criteria
-
The selected security baseline
-
The selected compliance baseline
-
The observed results
-
The generated Evidence
Traceability
This requirement supports:
KVP identifies a Key Value Proposition requirement.
This requirement also relates to:
ConOps Relationship
The Crucible Concept of Operations describes Phase 1 as a command-line utility invoked through CI/CD Pipeline steps.
The Phase 1 workflow:
-
Composes Image Layers and Infrastructure Baselines
-
Builds and hardens Machine Images
-
Captures dependencies and Compliance Findings
-
Performs Infrastructure Deployment
-
Produces supporting Evidence
This workflow provides the operational realization of environment creation, Reproducibility, security control application, and compliance evaluation.
Delivery Phase
Phase 1 and subsequent phases
Implementation Status
Not Assessed
Implementation status requires verification against the current Crucible implementation and applicable acceptance criteria.
Requirement Status
Draft
The source System Requirements Specification identifies Version 1.1 as a draft.
Notes for Editors
This requirement page should retain the stable requirement identifier `MO-001`.
Changes to the Statement SHALL preserve the approved intent of the source requirement.
Material changes should receive review and should update the related Traceability, verification criteria, and source records.
The Source Statement should preserve the original wording from the controlling System Requirements Specification.
The shared Terms and Definitions corpus should include definitions for:
-
Acceptance Criteria
-
CI/CD Pipeline
-
Compliance Assessment
-
Compliance Baseline
-
Controlled Input
-
Infrastructure Environment
-
Operational Lifecycle
-
Security Baseline
-
Security Plane
Do not rename this page once it has been cited externally unless a redirect or move plan is in place.
© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.