dido:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

dido:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms:start [2026/07/08 13:09] – created nick_didodido:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms:start [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 3: Line 3:
 [[dido:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:start|Return to Business Committee Evaluation Criteria]] [[dido:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:start|Return to Business Committee Evaluation Criteria]]
  
-Final candidate OMG submissions often combine technologies before all technologies have been implemented in a single system. Nevertheless, the Business Committee expects evidence that each major feature has been implemented, preferably more than once, by separate organisations.+Final candidate OMG submissions often combine technologies before all technologies have been implemented in a single system. Nevertheless, the Business Committee expects evidence that each major feature has been implemented, preferably more than once, by separate organizations.
  
 Pre-production implementations are acceptable. Pre-production implementations are acceptable.
  • dido/00-sip-ra/04-instructions-for-submitters/04-5-business-committee-terms/04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria/04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms/start.1783541355.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/07/08 13:09
  • by nick_dido