FDIS-RA provides financial-domain architectural precedent for systems that interpret, validate, compare, govern, audit, and Evidence financial information. This part aligns with FDIS-RA by defining FX logical structures and interactions that support semantic interpretation, validation, provenance, comparability, governance, release control, and defensibility.
FDIS-RA does not replace SIP-RA as the parent reference architecture. It informs the financial interpretation concerns that the FX Demo Logical Profile preserves.
Table 3-2: FDIS-RA concerns aligned with the FX Demo Logical Profile.
| FDIS-RA concern | Part 3 FX logical treatment |
|---|---|
| Semantic interpretation | Defines FX Semantic Interpretation Node, FX Semantic Assertion, and FX Semantic Interpretation interactions. |
| Validation and comparability | Defines FX Validation Node, FX Validation Result, validation interaction patterns, and Traceability to input information and validation rules. |
| Provenance and auditability | Defines FX Audit and Provenance Node, FX Audit Record, FX Provenance Record, and related endpoints and interaction patterns. |
| Evidence and defensibility | Defines FX Evidence expectations for intake, validation, interpretation, contract state, cash-flow computation, release, audit, provenance, replay, and reconstruction. |
| Governance of meaning | Defines FX logical ownership, versioning, Logical Compatibility, change control, admission rules, and Logical Policy Constraints. |
| Controlled release | Defines FX Policy and Release Node, FX Policy Decision, FX Release Package, and release-to-oversight interactions. |
| Technology neutrality | Keeps FX logical interpretation independent of implementation technologies, products, protocols, programming languages, and deployment mechanisms. |
© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.