Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:v:validation_decision [2026/09/12 17:42] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:v:validation_decision [2026/09/12 17:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Validation Decision ====== | ||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision is a determination by an authorized [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision can evaluate: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A distributed system | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * An [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A configuration | ||
| + | * An interface | ||
| + | * A process | ||
| + | * A capability | ||
| + | * A requirement | ||
| + | * Another subject of [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision can use: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Applicable exceptions and waivers | ||
| + | * Applicable expert judgment | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision can identify: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Its identity | ||
| + | * Its name | ||
| + | * Its description | ||
| + | * Its evaluated subject | ||
| + | * Its validation purpose | ||
| + | * Its decision value | ||
| + | * Its decision status | ||
| + | * Its decision time | ||
| + | * Its effective time | ||
| + | * Its expiration time | ||
| + | * Its authorized decision-maker | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * Its Acceptance Criteria | ||
| + | * Its supporting Test Runs | ||
| + | * Its supporting Test Results | ||
| + | * Its supporting Verdicts | ||
| + | * Its supporting Evidence | ||
| + | * Its applicable Baseline | ||
| + | * Its applicable limitations | ||
| + | * Its applicable conditions | ||
| + | * Its applicable exceptions | ||
| + | * Its applicable Governance Policies | ||
| + | * Its superseded Validation Decision | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision can determine that the evaluated subject: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Satisfies the applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * Does not satisfy the applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * Conditionally satisfies the applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * Cannot be evaluated conclusively from the available information | ||
| + | * Requires additional testing or Evidence | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adapted from: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * DIDO Reference Implementation Conceptual Model | ||
| + | * DIDO-TE draft Requirements Register | ||
| + | |||
| + | OMG TestIF supports the interchange of Test Results, Verdicts, and traceability information needed for external arbitration. OMG TestIF leaves the arbitration rules and resulting higher-level determinations outside its scope. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This definition introduces Validation Decision as the governed determination made by applying defined Validation Criteria to the applicable Test Results, Verdicts, Evidence, and related information. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision differs from [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Validation is the evaluation activity | ||
| + | * A Validation Decision records the resulting determination | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Test Result records an outcome associated with a Sequenced Test Object or Sequence Step | ||
| + | * A Validation Decision determines whether the evaluated subject satisfies the applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Verdict classifies an individual or aggregated Test Result | ||
| + | * A Validation Decision applies the governing Validation Criteria to the relevant Test Results, Verdicts, Evidence, and contextual information | ||
| + | |||
| + | A PASS Verdict does not, by itself, establish a positive Validation Decision. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision differs from an acceptance decision: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Validation Decision determines whether the evaluated subject satisfies defined Validation Criteria for a stated purpose | ||
| + | * An acceptance decision determines whether an authorized party accepts the evaluated subject | ||
| + | |||
| + | An authorized party can accept a subject subject to limitations or waivers even when the Validation Decision identifies unresolved deficiencies. Conversely, a positive Validation Decision does not compel an authorized party to accept the subject. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision differs from an authorization decision: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Validation Decision determines whether the evaluated subject satisfies defined Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * An authorization decision grants or denies permission to use, deploy, operate, release, or rely on the evaluated subject | ||
| + | |||
| + | A positive Validation Decision can support an authorization decision but does not replace it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision must identify the applicable validation purpose. A subject can satisfy Validation Criteria for one purpose and fail to satisfy criteria for another purpose. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision does not establish universal correctness, | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The identified evaluated subject | ||
| + | * The stated validation purpose | ||
| + | * The applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * The applicable Baseline | ||
| + | * The evaluated conditions | ||
| + | * The available Evidence | ||
| + | * The effective period | ||
| + | * Any recorded limitations or exceptions | ||
| + | |||
| + | An authorized Actor must make or approve the Validation Decision under the applicable Governance Policy. | ||
| + | |||
| + | An automated mechanism can calculate a proposed Validation Decision when the applicable Validation Criteria are machine-processable. The Governance Policy determines whether the automated determination constitutes the authoritative Validation Decision or requires approval by an authorized Actor. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Validation Decision can change when: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The evaluated subject changes | ||
| + | * The applicable Baseline changes | ||
| + | * The Validation Criteria change | ||
| + | * The applicable Test Results change | ||
| + | * New Evidence becomes available | ||
| + | * An exception or waiver changes | ||
| + | * The effective period expires | ||
| + | * An authorized review overturns the previous determination | ||
| + | |||
| + | A revised Validation Decision should preserve: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The previous Validation Decision | ||
| + | * The reason for the revision | ||
| + | * The responsible Actor | ||
| + | * The applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * The supporting Test Results | ||
| + | * The supporting Verdicts | ||
| + | * The supporting Evidence | ||
| + | * The applicable Provenance | ||
| + | * The applicable Traceability | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An authorized Evaluator reviews whether a selected [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Evaluator considers: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The approved Test Definition Versions | ||
| + | * The applicable Test Environment | ||
| + | * The applicable Test Runs | ||
| + | * The resulting Test Results | ||
| + | * The assigned Verdicts | ||
| + | * The supporting Evidence | ||
| + | * The approved Baseline | ||
| + | * The applicable Governance Policies | ||
| + | * Any recorded exceptions | ||
| + | |||
| + | All required Test Results have PASS Verdicts except one Test Result with an INCONCLUSIVE Verdict caused by missing timing Evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The applicable Governance Policy prohibits a positive Validation Decision when required timing Evidence is missing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Evaluator records a Validation Decision stating that the Node Set cannot yet be determined to satisfy the Validation Criteria. The Validation Decision identifies: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The evaluated Node Set | ||
| + | * The stated validation purpose | ||
| + | * The applicable Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * The inconclusive Test Result | ||
| + | * The missing Evidence | ||
| + | * The additional Test Execution required | ||
| + | * The authorized Evaluator | ||
| + | * The decision time | ||
| + | * The applicable Provenance | ||
| + | * The applicable Traceability | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||