Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:quality_characteristic [2026/09/12 17:42] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:quality_characteristic [2026/09/12 17:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Quality Characteristic ====== | ||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic is an [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic can apply to: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A software product | ||
| + | * A hardware product | ||
| + | * A service | ||
| + | * A technology | ||
| + | * A process | ||
| + | * A result | ||
| + | * Another evaluation subject | ||
| + | |||
| + | Quality Characteristics can include: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Functional Correctness | ||
| + | * Performance Efficiency | ||
| + | * Reliability | ||
| + | * Operational Stability | ||
| + | * Security | ||
| + | * Interoperability | ||
| + | * Scalability | ||
| + | * Maintainability | ||
| + | * Recoverability | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic can be decomposed into more specific Quality Characteristics or quality subcharacteristics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic can identify: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Its identity | ||
| + | * Its name | ||
| + | * Its description | ||
| + | * Its parent Quality Characteristic | ||
| + | * Its child Quality Characteristics | ||
| + | * Its evaluation subject | ||
| + | * Its applicable context | ||
| + | * Its applicable measures | ||
| + | * Its applicable measurement methods | ||
| + | * Its applicable measurement units | ||
| + | * Its applicable reference values | ||
| + | * Its applicable DIDO [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adapted from: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * DIDO Reference Implementation Conceptual Model | ||
| + | * DIDO-TE draft Requirements Register | ||
| + | |||
| + | ISO/IEC 25002 describes quality models composed of quality characteristics and subcharacteristics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ISO/IEC 25010 defines a product-quality model containing characteristics and subcharacteristics applicable to ICT and software products. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This definition places Quality Characteristic within the broader DIDO Evaluation Characteristic model so DIDO-TE can evaluate both quality properties and non-quality characteristics such as cost and resource consumption. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Every Quality Characteristic is an Evaluation Characteristic. An Evaluation Characteristic is not necessarily a Quality Characteristic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic differs from a measure: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Quality Characteristic identifies the quality property subject to evaluation | ||
| + | * A measure identifies how a value is assigned to the Quality Characteristic | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic differs from a quality requirement: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Quality Characteristic identifies a quality property | ||
| + | * A quality requirement establishes a normative obligation concerning that quality property | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Quality Characteristic identifies what is evaluated | ||
| + | * A Test Result records an outcome produced by [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | One Test Result can provide information about multiple Quality Characteristics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Multiple Test Results can contribute to the evaluation of one Quality Characteristic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Quality Characteristic does not by itself establish: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A required value | ||
| + | * A minimum value | ||
| + | * A maximum value | ||
| + | * A preferred direction | ||
| + | * A measurement method | ||
| + | * A permitted tolerance | ||
| + | * An acceptance threshold | ||
| + | |||
| + | The applicable Acceptance Criteria or Validation Criteria establish those constraints. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A higher numerical value does not necessarily indicate better quality. The interpretation depends on the Quality Characteristic and its applicable measure. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For example: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Higher throughput can indicate greater Performance Efficiency | ||
| + | * Higher response time can indicate lower Performance Efficiency | ||
| + | * Higher failure frequency can indicate lower Reliability | ||
| + | * Higher recovery success can indicate greater Recoverability | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A DIDO-TE comparative evaluation selects Reliability as a Quality Characteristic. | ||
| + | |||
| + | The applicable Acceptance Criteria establish: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * The Candidate Solutions subject to evaluation | ||
| + | * The workload | ||
| + | * The Test Environment | ||
| + | * The duration of the evaluation | ||
| + | * The failure conditions | ||
| + | * The Reliability measures | ||
| + | * The required measurement precision | ||
| + | * The comparison method | ||
| + | |||
| + | DIDO-TE produces Test Results used to evaluate Reliability for each Candidate Solution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reliability identifies the quality property being evaluated. The Test Results contain the observations and measurements used to evaluate it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||