Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evaluation_characteristic [2026/09/12 17:42] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evaluation_characteristic [2026/09/12 17:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Evaluation Characteristic ====== | ||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic identifies a characteristic of a subject selected for measurement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | A subject can include: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A service | ||
| + | * A software component | ||
| + | * A hardware component | ||
| + | * A product | ||
| + | * A technology | ||
| + | * An architecture | ||
| + | * An implementation | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * An [[public: | ||
| + | * A process | ||
| + | * An outcome | ||
| + | * Another subject of evaluation | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic can concern: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Quality | ||
| + | * Functional behavior | ||
| + | * Performance | ||
| + | * Reliability | ||
| + | * Security | ||
| + | * Resource consumption | ||
| + | * Cost | ||
| + | * Compliance | ||
| + | * Risk | ||
| + | * Another observable or measurable property | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic can identify: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Its identity | ||
| + | * Its name | ||
| + | * Its description | ||
| + | * Its characteristic type | ||
| + | * Its subject | ||
| + | * Its applicable context | ||
| + | * Its applicable measure | ||
| + | * Its measurement method | ||
| + | * Its observation method | ||
| + | * Its comparison method | ||
| + | * Its evaluation method | ||
| + | * Its measurement unit | ||
| + | * Its required precision | ||
| + | * Its permitted tolerance | ||
| + | * Its permitted exclusions | ||
| + | * Its applicable reference value | ||
| + | * Its applicable DIDO [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic can be evaluated using: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A direct measurement | ||
| + | * A derived measurement | ||
| + | * An observation | ||
| + | * A binary determination | ||
| + | * A qualitative classification | ||
| + | * A quantitative comparison | ||
| + | * A statistical comparison | ||
| + | * A structural comparison | ||
| + | * A behavioral comparison | ||
| + | * A temporal comparison | ||
| + | * A semantic comparison | ||
| + | * Another method established by the Acceptance Criteria | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adapted from: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[https:// | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * DIDO Reference Implementation Conceptual Model | ||
| + | * DIDO-TE draft Requirements Register | ||
| + | |||
| + | ISO/IEC 25002 establishes a framework for quality models composed of quality characteristics and subcharacteristics. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ISO/IEC 25010 defines a product-quality model for specifying, measuring, and evaluating ICT and software-product quality. | ||
| + | |||
| + | This definition generalizes the characteristic concept to include quality and non-quality characteristics used by DIDO-TE to evaluate Candidate Solutions and other subjects. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic differs from a measure: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * An Evaluation Characteristic identifies what is evaluated | ||
| + | * A measure identifies how a value is assigned to the Evaluation Characteristic | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic differs from a measured value: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * An Evaluation Characteristic identifies the property subject to evaluation | ||
| + | * A measured value records the result obtained by applying a measure | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic differs from [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * An Evaluation Characteristic identifies what is evaluated | ||
| + | * Validation Criteria establish the conditions used to determine whether the evaluation outcome is acceptable | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic differs from [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * An Evaluation Characteristic identifies what is evaluated | ||
| + | * Acceptance Criteria establish the conditions, methods, limits, and evidence used to determine acceptance | ||
| + | |||
| + | The same Evaluation Characteristic can have different: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Measures | ||
| + | * Measurement units | ||
| + | * Measurement conditions | ||
| + | * Reference values | ||
| + | * Tolerances | ||
| + | * Validation Criteria | ||
| + | * Acceptance Criteria | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Evaluation Characteristic should be sufficiently specific to permit selection of an applicable measurement, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Terms such as **better**, **faster**, **more reliable**, and **more efficient** do not identify objectively verifiable outcomes unless the applicable Evaluation Characteristic, | ||
| + | |||
| + | A [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An organization uses [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The applicable Acceptance Criteria select the following Evaluation Characteristics: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Functional Correctness | ||
| + | * Performance Efficiency | ||
| + | * Reliability | ||
| + | * Energy Consumption | ||
| + | * Cost | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each Evaluation Characteristic has its own measures, measurement conditions, units, precision, tolerances, and comparison rules. | ||
| + | |||
| + | DIDO-TE preserves Traceability among each Candidate Solution, Evaluation Characteristic, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||