Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:comparability [2026/09/12 17:42] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:comparability [2026/09/12 17:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Comparability ====== | ||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comparability concerns the ability to examine information, | ||
| + | |||
| + | In regulated data interpretation environments, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comparability depends on explicit knowledge of the conditions governing each item being compared, including: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Applicable definitions | ||
| + | * Semantic version | ||
| + | * Reporting period | ||
| + | * Jurisdiction | ||
| + | * Classification rules | ||
| + | * Calculation methods | ||
| + | * Parameters | ||
| + | * Provenance | ||
| + | * Interpretive context | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comparability may exist fully, partially, or conditionally. An architecture should therefore preserve the basis for comparison rather than treat comparability as an assumed property of data. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //quality permitting meaningful comparison// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Federated Data Interpretation Systems Reference Architecture (FDIS-RA) | ||
| + | * ISO/IEC 25010, Systems and Software Quality Requirements and Evaluation | ||
| + | * Standard Business Report Model (SBRM) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comparability differs from equality. Two values may be unequal yet comparable when their meanings, contexts, and derivations support a valid comparison. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Comparability also differs from interoperability. Interoperability concerns the ability of systems to exchange and use information. Comparability concerns whether the exchanged information supports a meaningful comparison. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Two capital adequacy ratios are comparable when both use the same regulatory definition, reporting period, calculation basis, currency treatment, semantic version, and interpretive context. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||