Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:candidate_solution [2026/09/12 17:42] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:candidate_solution [2026/09/12 17:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Candidate Solution ====== | ||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution identifies a proposed means of satisfying a defined need that has been selected for evaluation. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution can consist of or identify: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A service | ||
| + | * A software component | ||
| + | * An [[public: | ||
| + | * A hardware component | ||
| + | * A product | ||
| + | * A technology | ||
| + | * An architecture | ||
| + | * An implementation | ||
| + | * A [[public: | ||
| + | * A proposed modification | ||
| + | * A combination of components, resources, configurations, | ||
| + | * Another proposed means of satisfying the defined need | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution can identify: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Its identity | ||
| + | * Its name | ||
| + | * Its description | ||
| + | * Its solution type | ||
| + | * Its intended purpose | ||
| + | * The defined need it proposes to satisfy | ||
| + | * Its provider | ||
| + | * Its owner | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable Configuration | ||
| + | * Its constituent components | ||
| + | * Its applicable Nodes | ||
| + | * Its applicable Node Sets | ||
| + | * Its interfaces | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its required [[public: | ||
| + | * Its required [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its evaluation characteristics | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its applicable [[public: | ||
| + | * Its evaluation status | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | * Its [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution becomes a selected Candidate Solution when an applicable [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Selection for evaluation does not constitute approval, acceptance, acquisition, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //proposed means of satisfying a defined need that has been selected for evaluation// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adapted from: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * [[public: | ||
| + | * DIDO Reference Implementation Conceptual Model | ||
| + | * DIDO-TE draft Requirements Register | ||
| + | * DIDO-TE Broad Agency Announcement source material | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Candidate Solution identifies a proposed means of satisfying a defined need | ||
| + | * A Test Item identifies an item subject to testing | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution selected for testing can be a Test Item. A Test Item is not necessarily a Candidate Solution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Candidate Solution is defined by its status as a proposed means selected for evaluation | ||
| + | * A Distributed System is defined by its distributed structure and behavior | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution can be a Distributed System, a part of a Distributed System, or a proposed change to a Distributed System. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Candidate Solution is the subject of an evaluation | ||
| + | * A Node is an architectural participant in a distributed system | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution can be realized by one Node, multiple Nodes, a Node Set, or a modification to a Node. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution differs from a [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * A Candidate Solution identifies the proposed means under evaluation | ||
| + | * A Configuration identifies the arrangement and settings applicable to an item | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Configuration can form part of a Candidate Solution or distinguish one Candidate Solution from another. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A change to any of the following can create a distinct Candidate Solution when the applicable evaluation rules treat the change as material: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Version | ||
| + | * Configuration | ||
| + | * Constituent component | ||
| + | * Dependency | ||
| + | * Interface | ||
| + | * Deployment Target | ||
| + | * Operational Resource | ||
| + | * Architecture | ||
| + | * Implementation | ||
| + | * Security control | ||
| + | * Governance constraint | ||
| + | |||
| + | The applicable Acceptance Criteria should establish the identity boundary of each Candidate Solution and identify which differences create a separate Candidate Solution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A Candidate Solution can be: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Proposed | ||
| + | * Selected for evaluation | ||
| + | * Under evaluation | ||
| + | * Evaluated | ||
| + | * Rejected | ||
| + | * Recommended | ||
| + | * Approved | ||
| + | * Accepted | ||
| + | |||
| + | These possible lifecycle conditions should not be treated as interchangeable. The applicable Governance Policies determine the permitted lifecycle conditions and transitions. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A favorable comparative evaluation does not by itself approve a Candidate Solution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Approval, acceptance, acquisition, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An organization evaluates three implementations of a transaction-validation Node. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each implementation: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Provides the same required interface | ||
| + | * Processes the same Test Items | ||
| + | * Uses the same Test Argument Values | ||
| + | * Operates within an equivalent Test Environment | ||
| + | * Is evaluated using the same Test Definitions | ||
| + | * Is evaluated according to the same Acceptance Criteria | ||
| + | |||
| + | Each implementation is a separate Candidate Solution because it provides a different proposed means of satisfying the transaction-validation need. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | The resulting comparative evaluation identifies relative differences among the Candidate Solutions but does not by itself approve or select one for deployment. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||