Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:accreditation_boundary [2026/09/12 17:42] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | public:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:accreditation_boundary [2026/09/12 17:43] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Accreditation Boundary ====== | ||
| + | [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Accreditation Boundary identifies the systems, components, services, information, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The boundary establishes the scope of the applicable requirements, | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Accreditation Boundary may contain internal subdivisions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | For an [[public: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //defined scope of the systems, components, services, information, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Generalised from security-accreditation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An Accreditation Boundary defines the scope of an accreditation rather than a physical boundary alone. The boundary may include distributed components, external services under defined agreements, connected environments, | ||
| + | |||
| + | A dependency located outside the Accreditation Boundary may still affect the risks, controls, or evidence associated with the accredited entity. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Accreditation Boundary for a Software Factory includes source-control services, build services, hardened build workers, dependency repositories, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||