public:00-sip-ra:05-general-requirements-on-proposals:05-2-evaluation-criteria:05-2-4-conformance-inspectability-and-testability:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
public:00-sip-ra:05-general-requirements-on-proposals:05-2-evaluation-criteria:05-2-4-conformance-inspectability-and-testability:start [2026/09/15 13:52] – nick_didopublic:00-sip-ra:05-general-requirements-on-proposals:05-2-evaluation-criteria:05-2-4-conformance-inspectability-and-testability:start [2026/09/15 13:55] (current) – nick_dido
Line 7: Line 7:
 ===== Requirement ===== ===== Requirement =====
  
-  * **[[public:00-sip-ra:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:gpr-023-inspectable-and-testable-conformance|GPR-023 — Inspectable and Testable Conformance]]:** The proposed specification SHOULD define sufficient constraints on Interfaces, externally observable behavior, conformance-relevant implementation characteristics, and required evidence to permit unambiguous conformance assessment through manual inspection and automated testing+^ Requirement ^ Level ^ Statement ^ 
 +| [[public:00-sip-ra:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:gpr-023-inspectable-and-testable-conformance|GPR-023 — Inspectable and Testable Conformance]] | Recommended | {{section>public:00-sip-ra:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:gpr-023-inspectable-and-testable-conformance#Statement&noheader&nofooter&noeditbtn}} |
  
 ===== Related Requirements ===== ===== Related Requirements =====
Line 20: Line 21:
  
 ===== Notes for Editors ===== ===== Notes for Editors =====
 +
 +The requirement Statement displayed in this section is transcluded from the authoritative GPR-023 Annex C requirement record and is not an independently maintained copy.
  
 GPR-023 is recommended because it uses ''SHOULD''. GPR-023 is recommended because it uses ''SHOULD''.
Line 27: Line 30:
 Manual inspection and automated testing are complementary assessment methods. Not every conformance condition needs to be assessable using both methods, but the complete conformance model should support an appropriate combination of them. Manual inspection and automated testing are complementary assessment methods. Not every conformance condition needs to be assessable using both methods, but the complete conformance model should support an appropriate combination of them.
  
-The terms “unambiguous” and “objective” do not require every conformance decision to use an identical testing method. They require the applicable conditions, expected evidence, and acceptance criteria to be defined with sufficient precision to produce consistent conclusions.+The terms “unambiguous” and “objective” do not require every conformance decision to use an identical assessment method. They require the applicable conditions, required evidence, and acceptance criteria to be defined with sufficient precision to support consistent conclusions.
  
-After the Annex C record is created and reviewed, replace the locally maintained Statement with a transclusion of its authoritative Statement.+Make changes to the Statement on the GPR-023 Annex C requirement page.
  
 ---- ----
  • public/00-sip-ra/05-general-requirements-on-proposals/05-2-evaluation-criteria/05-2-4-conformance-inspectability-and-testability/start.1789505577.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/09/15 13:52
  • by nick_dido