public:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms:start

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
public:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms:start [2026/09/12 18:33] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1public:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:04-5-2-1-viable-to-implement-across-platforms:start [2026/09/12 18:34] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== 4.5.2.1 Viable to Implement Across Platforms ======
 +
 +[[public:00-sip-ra:04-instructions-for-submitters:04-5-business-committee-terms:04-5-2-business-committee-evaluation-criteria:start|Return to Business Committee Evaluation Criteria]]
 +
 +Final candidate OMG submissions often combine technologies before all technologies have been implemented in a single system. Nevertheless, the Business Committee expects evidence that each major feature has been implemented, preferably more than once, by separate organizations.
 +
 +Pre-production implementations are acceptable.
 +
 +Since the use of OMG specifications should not depend on any one platform, submissions should also demonstrate cross-platform availability and interoperability of implementations.
 +
 +----
 +
 +<WRAP centeralign>
 +© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.
 +</WRAP>