Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- fxdemo:06-part:11-fx-demo-application:start [2026/07/11 11:15] – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
+++ fxdemo:06-part:11-fx-demo-application:start [2026/07/20 18:31] (current) – removed redundant "plane" word after initial linked cost recovery plane mention dan
@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [[fxdemo:06-part:start | Go to Top]]
-The FX Demo applies the [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:cost_recovery_compensation_and_settlement_plane]] Plane to a governed foreign-exchange processing scenario. The demo shows how economic accountability connects to work attribution, policy obligations, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence]] references, provider qualification, cost rules, and settlement outcomes.
+The FX Demo applies the [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:cost_recovery_compensation_and_settlement_plane]] to a governed foreign-exchange processing scenario. The demo shows how economic accountability connects to work attribution, policy obligations, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence]] references, provider qualification, cost rules, and settlement outcomes.
 The demo does not implement production billing, payment execution, tax treatment, or legal settlement. It demonstrates the architectural pattern for evidence-linked cost attribution and shows how the plane separates efficient compliant processing from under-compliance.