Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| fxdemo:06-part:11-fx-demo-application:11-2-conceptual-flow:start [2026/06/27 09:59] – created nick_dido | fxdemo:06-part:11-fx-demo-application:11-2-conceptual-flow:start [2026/08/05 16:45] (current) – dan | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== 10.2 Conceptual Flow ====== | ====== 10.2 Conceptual Flow ====== | ||
| + | [[fxdemo: | ||
| The FX Demo uses the following conceptual flow. | The FX Demo uses the following conceptual flow. | ||
| Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
| - An FX transaction enters the demo environment. | - An FX transaction enters the demo environment. | ||
| - The Policy and Release Plane identifies the governed work required for the transaction. | - The Policy and Release Plane identifies the governed work required for the transaction. | ||
| - | - [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes: | + | - [[dido:99_annexes: |
| - Each Qualified Node records a Work Performed Event. | - Each Qualified Node records a Work Performed Event. | ||
| - | - Each [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes: | + | - Each [[dido:99_annexes: |
| - The Persistence and Evidence Plane retains the evidence needed to support audit, replay, review, and settlement. | - The Persistence and Evidence Plane retains the evidence needed to support audit, replay, review, and settlement. | ||
| - | - The [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes: | + | - The [[dido:99_annexes: |
| - | - The plane produces [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes: | + | - The plane produces [[dido:99_annexes: |
| - | - The plane identifies missing evidence for required governed work through [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes: | + | - The plane identifies missing evidence for required governed work through [[dido:99_annexes: |
| - Accounting, governance, audit, regulatory, contractual, | - Accounting, governance, audit, regulatory, contractual, | ||
| This flow shows how the FX Demo prices governed work without inspecting unnecessary business content. It also shows how the architecture distinguishes compliant cost efficiency from apparent savings caused by missing work, incomplete evidence, or avoided obligations. | This flow shows how the FX Demo prices governed work without inspecting unnecessary business content. It also shows how the architecture distinguishes compliant cost efficiency from apparent savings caused by missing work, incomplete evidence, or avoided obligations. | ||