| Next revision | Previous revision |
| fxdemo:02-part:07-logical-communication-model:07-12-communication-direction-and-coupling:start [2026/07/02 17:47] – created owen | fxdemo:02-part:07-logical-communication-model:07-12-communication-direction-and-coupling:start [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 |
|---|
| [[fxdemo:02-part:start | Go To Top ]] | [[fxdemo:02-part:start | Go To Top ]] |
| |
| Communication Direction specifies the logical flow of information between [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_node|Logical Nodes]] and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_communication_endpoint|Logical Communication Endpoints]]. | Communication Direction specifies the logical flow of information between [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_node|Logical Nodes]] and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_communication_endpoint|Logical Communication Endpoints]]. |
| |
| The Logical Architecture supports one-way exchange, two-way exchange, request/response exchange, command/acknowledgement exchange, event production and consumption, and other directed exchange patterns. Communication Direction describes the logical flow of information, not the physical network route or protocol behaviour. | The Logical Architecture supports one-way exchange, two-way exchange, request/response exchange, command/acknowledgement exchange, event production and consumption, and other directed exchange patterns. Communication Direction describes the logical flow of information, not the physical network route or protocol behavior. |
| |
| Logical coupling describes the degree to which a [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_node|Logical Node]] depends on another [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_node|Logical Node]], endpoint, information structure, timing expectation, or response expectation. The Logical Communication Model favours explicit coupling over hidden coupling. A logical interaction identifies the dependency so reviewers can assess governance, [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]], resilience, [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_compatibility|Compatibility]], and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] expectations. | Logical coupling describes the degree to which a [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_node|Logical Node]] depends on another [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_node|Logical Node]], endpoint, information structure, timing expectation, or response expectation. The Logical Communication Model favours explicit coupling over hidden coupling. A logical interaction identifies the dependency so reviewers can assess governance, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]], resilience, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_compatibility|Compatibility]], and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] expectations. |
| |
| ---- | ---- |