This is an old revision of the document!
3.2 Alignment with FDIS-RA
FDIS-RA provides financial-domain architectural precedent for systems that interpret, validate, compare, govern, audit, and evidence financial information. This part aligns with FDIS-RA by defining logical structures and interactions that support semantic interpretation, validation, provenance, comparability, governance, release control, and defensibility.
FDIS-RA does not replace SIP-RA as the parent reference architecture. It informs the financial interpretation concerns that this Logical Architecture / PIM must address.
Table 3-2: FDIS-RA concerns aligned with the Logical Architecture / PIM
| FDIS-RA concern | Part 2: logical treatment |
|---|---|
| Semantic interpretation | Defines logical information structures and logical interaction patterns that can support semantic interpretation without binding to a specific ontology technology. |
| Validation and comparability | Defines logical validation, assertion, and Traceability relationships that support comparable interpretation across Nodes and profiles. |
| Provenance and auditability | Defines logical audit and provenance interactions across Nodes, endpoints, information structures, and Runtime Planes. |
| Evidence and defensibility | Defines logical expectations for Evidence and Traceability relationships that later parts can map to evidence artefacts. |
| Governance of meaning | Defines logical governance relationships for definitions, versions, compatibility, policy constraints, and change control. |
| Technology neutrality | Keeps financial interpretation logic independent of specific implementation technologies or deployment mechanisms. |