| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision |
| fxdemo:02-part:03-traceability-to-parent-and-source-architectures:03-2-alignment-with-fdis-ra:start [2026/07/02 14:45] – owen | fxdemo:02-part:03-traceability-to-parent-and-source-architectures:03-2-alignment-with-fdis-ra:start [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 |
|---|
| [[fxdemo:02-part:start | Go To Top ]] | [[fxdemo:02-part:start | Go To Top ]] |
| |
| FDIS-RA provides financial-domain architectural precedent for systems that interpret, validate, compare, govern, audit, and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|evidence]] financial information. This part aligns with FDIS-RA by defining logical structures and interactions that support semantic interpretation, validation, provenance, comparability, governance, release control, and defensibility. | FDIS-RA provides financial-domain architectural precedent for systems that interpret, validate, compare, govern, audit, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|evidence]] financial information. This part aligns with FDIS-RA by defining logical structures and interactions that support semantic interpretation, validation, provenance, comparability, governance, release control, and defensibility. |
| |
| FDIS-RA does not replace SIP-RA as the parent reference architecture. It informs the financial interpretation concerns that this Logical Architecture / PIM must address. | FDIS-RA does not replace SIP-RA as the parent reference architecture. It informs the financial interpretation concerns that this Logical Architecture / PIM must address. |
| |
| ^ FDIS-RA concern ^ Part 2: logical treatment ^ | ^ FDIS-RA concern ^ Part 2: logical treatment ^ |
| | Semantic interpretation | Defines [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_data_structure_definition|logical information structures]] and logical interaction patterns that can support semantic interpretation without binding to a specific ontology technology. | | | Semantic interpretation | Defines [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_data_structure_definition|logical information structures]] and logical interaction patterns that can support semantic interpretation without binding to a specific ontology technology. | |
| | Validation and comparability | Defines logical validation, [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_assertion|assertion]], and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] relationships that support comparable interpretation across Nodes and profiles. | | | Validation and comparability | Defines logical validation, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_assertion|assertion]], and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] relationships that support comparable interpretation across Nodes and profiles. | |
| | Provenance and auditability | Defines logical audit and provenance interactions across Nodes, endpoints, [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_data_structure_definition|information structures]], and Runtime Planes. | | | Provenance and auditability | Defines logical audit and provenance interactions across Nodes, endpoints, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_data_structure_definition|information structures]], and Runtime Planes. | |
| | Evidence and defensibility | Defines logical expectations for [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] relationships that later parts can map to evidence artefacts. | | | Evidence and defensibility | Defines logical expectations for [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] relationships that later parts can map to evidence artifacts. | |
| | Governance of meaning | Defines logical governance relationships for definitions, versions, [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_compatibility|compatibility]], [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_policy_constraints|policy constraints]], and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_change_control|change control]]. | | | Governance of meaning | Defines logical governance relationships for definitions, versions, [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_compatibility|compatibility]], [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_policy_constraints|policy constraints]], and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_change_control|change control]]. | |
| | Technology neutrality | Keeps financial interpretation logic independent of specific implementation technologies or deployment mechanisms. | | | Technology neutrality | Keeps financial interpretation logic independent of specific implementation technologies or deployment mechanisms. | |
| |