fxdemo:01-part:10-conceptual-traceability-model:10-7-bidirectional-review-and-impact-analysis

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
fxdemo:01-part:10-conceptual-traceability-model:10-7-bidirectional-review-and-impact-analysis [2026/06/30 17:10] owenfxdemo:01-part:10-conceptual-traceability-model:10-7-bidirectional-review-and-impact-analysis [2026/08/04 07:09] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
Line 2: Line 2:
 [[fxdemo:01-part:start | Go to Top ]] [[fxdemo:01-part:start | Go to Top ]]
  
-[[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] supports review in two directions.+[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] supports review in two directions.
  
-Forward [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] starts with a conceptual concern and follows it outward through logical design, implementation mapping, deployment, and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]]. It helps reviewers confirm that the system implements and evidences the intended architecture.+Forward [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] starts with a conceptual concern and follows it outward through logical design, implementation mapping, deployment, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]]. It helps reviewers confirm that the system implements and evidences the intended architecture.
  
-Backward [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] starts with [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]], deployment artefacts, implementation artefacts, or logical elements and traces back to the conceptual concern they support. It helps reviewers determine why an artefact exists and which architectural claim it supports.+Backward [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] starts with [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]], deployment artifacts, implementation artifacts, or logical elements and traces back to the conceptual concern they support. It helps reviewers determine why an artifact exists and which architectural claim it supports.
  
-Bidirectional [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] supports impact analysis. When a concept changes, reviewers can identify affected logical elements, implementation artefacts, deployment artefacts, and [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] packages. When an implementation artefact changes, reviewers can identify the logical and conceptual elements at risk. When [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] is lacking, reviewers can identify the claim, deployment artefact, implementation artefact, and logical element that require review.+Bidirectional [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:t:traceability|Traceability]] supports impact analysis. When a concept changes, reviewers can identify affected logical elements, implementation artifacts, deployment artifacts, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] packages. When an implementation artifact changes, reviewers can identify the logical and conceptual elements at risk. When [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] is lacking, reviewers can identify the claim, deployment artifact, implementation artifact, and logical element that require review.
  
 Examples of impact-analysis questions include: Examples of impact-analysis questions include:
  
-  * Which implementation artefacts realise this logical [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:communication_endpoint|Communication Endpoint]]? +  * Which implementation artifacts realize this logical [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:communication_endpoint|Communication Endpoint]]? 
-  * Which deployed [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:n:node|Node]]s use this [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:d:data_structure_definition|Data Structure Definition]]? +  * Which deployed [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:f:financial_node|Node]]s use this [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:d:data_structure_definition|Data Structure Definition]]? 
-  * Which [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] items support this release-control claim? +  * Which [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] items support this release-control claim? 
-  * Which tests exercise this [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:r:runtime_plane|Runtime Plane]]? +  * Which tests exercise this [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:r:runtime_plane|Runtime Plane]]? 
-  * Which profiles inherit this [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:classification_path|Classification Path]]? +  * Which profiles inherit this [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:classification_path|Classification Path]]? 
-  * Which artefacts require review if a [[fxdemo:99_part_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:communication_endpoint|Communication Endpoint]] changes?+  * Which artifacts require review if a [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:communication_endpoint|Communication Endpoint]] changes? 
 + 
 + 
 +---- 
 + 
 +<WRAP centeralign> 
 + 
 +© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. 
 + 
 +</WRAP> 
 + 
  • fxdemo/01-part/10-conceptual-traceability-model/10-7-bidirectional-review-and-impact-analysis.1782864631.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/06/30 17:10
  • by owen