Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| fxdemo:01-part:04-traceability-to-parent-and-source-architectures:04-4-traceability-position [2026/06/26 16:00] – owen | fxdemo:01-part:04-traceability-to-parent-and-source-architectures:04-4-traceability-position [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| [[fxdemo: | [[fxdemo: | ||
| - | The Financial Systems Archetype uses the following traceability position. | + | The Financial Systems Archetype uses the following |
| - | SIP-RA provides the parent with a structured information processing discipline. FDIS-RA provides financial-domain interpretation alignment. The original FX Demo Reference Architecture provides source material that the new document set normalises | + | SIP-RA provides the parent with a structured information processing discipline. FDIS-RA provides financial-domain |
| - | This traceability position prevents three kinds of confusion. | + | This [[dido: |
| - | First, it prevents FDIS-RA from replacing SIP-RA as the parent | + | First, it prevents FDIS-RA from replacing SIP-RA as the parent |
| + | |||
| + | Part 1, therefore, defines only the conceptual architecture. Later parts carry forward logical, domain-profile, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | |||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | |||
| + | </ | ||
| - | Part 1, therefore, defines only the conceptual architecture. Later parts carry forward logical, domain-profile, | ||