Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- fxdemo:00-part:05-layered-document-structure:start [2026/06/24 15:17] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1
+++ fxdemo:00-part:05-layered-document-structure:start [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+====== 4. Layered Document Structure ======
+[[fxdemo:00-part:start | Go to Top ]]
+The Financial Systems Archetype uses a layered document structure.
+Financial Systems Archetype
+  * **Part 0:**	Document Set Overview and Reader’s Guide
+  * **Part 1:**	Conceptual Architecture
+  * **Part 2:**	Logical Architecture / PIM
+  * **Part 3:**	FX Demo Logical Profile
+  * **Part 4:**	Phase 0 Implementation Profile / PSM
+  * **Part 5:**	Phase 0 Deployment, Testability, and Evidence Plan
+Later work may add more parts for additional financial domains, implementation profiles, deployment profiles, or evidence packages.
+Later work may also add phase-specific extension profiles that introduce additional architectural planes or governance capabilities after the initial executable baseline has been established. For example, a later Phase 2 profile may introduce a Policy / Governance Plane and Release Plane to support policy-governed information sharing, authorized release, data sovereignty, data residency, metadata and aggregate views, and evidence for cross-boundary release. Such later profiles should trace back to the Conceptual Architecture and Logical Architecture / PIM rather than redefining them.
+For example:
+Part 3A:	Commercial Paper Logical Profile
+Part 4A:	Commercial Paper Implementation Profile / PSM
+Part 5A:	Commercial Paper Deployment, Testability, and Evidence Plan
+The structure allows the Financial Systems Archetype to grow without turning one document into a mixed collection of concepts, implementation details, scripts, and test evidence.
+----
+<WRAP centeralign>
+© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.
+</WRAP>