| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision |
| fxdemo:00-part:02-scope:start [2026/06/26 15:47] – owen | fxdemo:00-part:02-scope:start [2026/07/11 11:15] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido |
|---|
| ====== 1. Scope ====== | ====== 1. Scope ====== |
| [[fxdemo:01-part:start | Go to Top ]] | [[fxdemo:00-part:start|Go to Top]] |
| |
| This part defines the scope, structure, and intended use of the Financial Systems Archetype document set. | This part defines the scope, structure, and intended use of the [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:f:financial_system|Financial Systems]] [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:archetype|Archetype]] document set. |
| |
| It explains how the document set applies the SDIS/SIP-RA discipline to financial systems by separating conceptual architecture, logical architecture, domain profiles, implementation profiles, deployment profiles, testability, and evidence. It gives readers a common map for understanding the relationships among the parts and the proper use of each. | It explains how the document set applies the SDIS/SIP-RA discipline to financial systems by separating conceptual architecture, logical architecture, domain profiles, implementation profiles, deployment profiles, testability, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|evidence]]. It gives readers a common map for understanding the relationships among the parts and the proper use of each. |
| |
| This part applies to all documents in the Financial Systems Archetype document set, including the Conceptual Architecture, Logical Architecture / PIM, FX Demo Logical Profile, Phase 0 Implementation Profile / PSM, and Phase 0 Deployment, Testability, and Evidence Plan. | This part applies to all documents in the Financial Systems Archetype document set, including the [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:c:conceptual_model]], [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_model]] / [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:p:platform_independent_model]], FX Demo Logical Profile, Phase 0 Implementation Profile / [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:p:platform_specific_model]], and Phase 0 Deployment, Testability, and Evidence Plan. |
| |
| This part does not define the Financial Systems Archetype concepts. Part 1 defines those concepts. This part does not define the platform-independent logical model. Part 2 defines that model. This part does not define the FX demonstration profile, Phase 0 implementation mappings, deployment procedures, Crucible scenarios, acceptance checks, scripts, repository structure, or runtime evidence. Later parts and supporting repository documentation address those concerns. | This part does not define the Financial Systems Archetype concepts. [[fxdemo:01-part:start]] defines those concepts. This part does not define the platform-independent [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_model|Logical Model]]. [[fxdemo:02-part:start]] defines that model. This part does not define the FX demonstration profile, Phase 0 implementation mappings, deployment procedures, Crucible scenarios, acceptance checks, scripts, repository structure, or [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:r:runtime_plane|runtime]] evidence. Later parts and supporting repository documentation address those concerns. |
| |
| This part guides readers, authors, reviewers, implementers, and maintainers in using the document set consistently. It establishes document-set boundaries, layering rules, and navigation guidance to prevent implementation details from redefining the conceptual or logical architecture. | This part guides readers, authors, reviewers, implementers, and maintainers in using the document set consistently. It establishes document-set boundaries, layering rules, and navigation guidance to prevent implementation details from redefining the conceptual or logical architecture. |
| | |
| | |
| | ---- |
| | |
| | <WRAP centeralign> |
| | |
| | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. |
| | |
| | </WRAP> |
| | |
| |