dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-002

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-002 [2026/07/11 12:57] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-002 [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== P2-REQ-16-2-002 ======
  
 +[[dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:start| Return to Requirements]]
 +
 +===== Statement =====
 +
 +The Logical Architecture / PIM SHALL define one logical architecture and SHALL NOT imply that it represents every possible logical architecture that conforms to Part 1.
 +
 +===== Source =====
 +
 +Part 2, Section 16.2: Distributed Node-Based Architecture Requirements.
 +
 +===== Rationale =====
 +
 +Part 2 defines a single reusable Logical Architecture / PIM for the Financial Systems Archetype. Other logical architectures may also conform to the Part 1 Conceptual Architecture, but they are outside the scope of this document set. Stating this explicitly prevents readers from interpreting the architecture defined in Part 2 as the only permissible logical realization.
 +
 +===== Applies To =====
 +
 +This requirement applies to the definition, review, interpretation, maintenance, and use of the Logical Architecture / PIM.
 +
 +It applies specifically to:
 +
 +  * The scope of the Logical Architecture;
 +  * Architectural interpretation;
 +  * Domain Logical Profiles derived from Part 2; and
 +  * Implementation Profiles based upon Part 2.
 +
 +===== Verification =====
 +
 +Verification SHALL confirm that Part 2 defines one Logical Architecture / PIM without claiming that it represents every possible logical architecture conforming to Part 1.
 +
 +Verification activities should include review checks confirming that:
 +
 +  * only one Logical Architecture is defined within Part 2;
 +  * alternative logical architectures are not excluded by implication;
 +  * the document consistently refers to the architecture defined in Part 2; and
 +  * no normative statements claim exclusivity beyond the scope of this document.
 +
 +===== Traceability =====
 +
 +This requirement supports traceability between the Part 1 Conceptual Architecture and the Logical Architecture defined by Part 2.
 +
 +Related requirement identifiers:
 +
 +  * [[dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-001]]
 +  * [[dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-003]]
 +  * [[dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-004]]
 +  * [[dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-02:p2-req-16-2-005]]
 +
 +Related source section:
 +
 +  * [[fxdemo:02-part:16-logical-requirements:16-2-distributed-node-based-architecture-requirements:start]]
 +
 +===== Status =====
 +
 +Draft
 +
 +----
 +
 +<WRAP centeralign>
 +© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.
 +</WRAP>