Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-00:p0-req-10-002 [2026/07/11 12:57] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:99_annexes:annex-d-requirements:part-00:p0-req-10-002 [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== P0-REQ-10-002 ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statement ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The document set SHALL define financial-system concepts before defining logical models, implementation profiles, or deployment profiles. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Part 0, Section 10: Document Set Requirements. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Rationale ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Financial Systems Archetype document set depends on a clear conceptual foundation. Financial-system concepts establish the meaning of the architecture before those concepts are refined into logical structures, mapped to implementation technologies, | ||
| + | |||
| + | If logical models, implementation profiles, or deployment profiles are defined before the underlying concepts are established, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Applies To ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This requirement applies to the organization, | ||
| + | |||
| + | It applies specifically to: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * conceptual architecture sections; | ||
| + | * financial-system concept definitions; | ||
| + | * logical models; | ||
| + | * implementation profiles; | ||
| + | * deployment profiles; and | ||
| + | * cross-references among document parts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verification ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Verification SHALL confirm that financial-system concepts are defined before they are used as the basis for logical, implementation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Verification activities should include review checks confirming that: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * conceptual terms are introduced before they are used in logical models; | ||
| + | * logical models refine defined financial-system concepts rather than inventing new meanings; | ||
| + | * implementation profiles map to logical elements rather than defining architecture directly; | ||
| + | * deployment profiles realize implementation profiles rather than bypassing conceptual or logical definitions; | ||
| + | * later document parts preserve the meanings established in earlier conceptual sections. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Traceability ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This requirement supports traceability from financial-system concepts to logical models, implementation profiles, deployment profiles, and evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Related requirement identifiers: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Related source section: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[fxdemo: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Status ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Draft | ||