Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:qualification_profile [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:q:qualification_profile [2026/07/11 11:15] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Qualification Profile ======
 +[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:start|Return to Terms and Definitions]]
 +
 +===== Discussion =====
 +A Qualification Profile records the recognised eligibility of a Node, Qualified Node, Service Provider, or Qualified Service Provider for defined governed functions and Non-Functional Characteristics. In the Governed Node Service Market, the Qualification Profile supports selection, comparison, integration, audit, governance review, Competitive Substitution, and compensation eligibility.
 +
 +A Qualification Profile helps Buyers, Integrators, Regulators, Auditors, and Governance Bodies understand what a participant or component is recognised to do, under which constraints, and with which assurance characteristics. It prevents the market from treating qualification as a simple yes-or-no condition. A Node may qualify for one governed function but not another. A Node may satisfy one Non-Functional Characteristic, such as Interoperability, while still requiring additional evidence for another characteristic, such as Securability or Reliability.
 +
 +A Qualification Profile may identify governed functions, recognised Non-Functional Characteristics, applicable jurisdictions, residency constraints, sovereignty constraints, policy obligations, evidence obligations, service-level expectations, qualification status, version, validity period, suspension status, and references to Qualification Evidence.
 +
 +===== Definition =====
 +//record that identifies recognised governed functions and Non-Functional Characteristics for a Node or Service Provider//
 +
 +===== Source =====
 +Financial Systems Archetype, Part 7: Governed Node Service Market
 +
 +===== Note =====
 +A Qualification Profile supports selection, integration, audit, governance review, Competitive Substitution, and compensation eligibility.
 +
 +A Qualification Profile differs from Qualification Evidence. A Qualification Profile records recognised eligibility. Qualification Evidence supports that recognition.
 +
 +A Qualification Profile does not by itself prove that a specific item of governed work occurred. A Work Performed Event records completed governed work, and an Evidence Reference links a record to supporting evidence.
 +
 +===== Example =====
 +A sanctions screening Node has a Qualification Profile that identifies it as qualified for sanctions screening within a defined jurisdiction. The profile identifies recognised Reliability, Securability, Interoperability, Performance, and Evidence Reference capabilities, together with the applicable policy obligations, service-level expectations, and Qualification Evidence references.