Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:o:ontology_language [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:o:ontology_language [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Ontology Language ====== | ||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An ontology language provides a formal means to express an [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | An ontology language differs from the ontology itself. The language provides the expression mechanism. The ontology provides the domain commitments expressed through that mechanism. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ontology languages and representation approaches differ in their assumptions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //formal language used to express an ontology// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Generalised from common ontology engineering usage and specialized for use in the FX Demo Reference Architecture. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An ontology language differs from a graph store, serialisation format, modeling tool, or reasoner. Those technologies support ontology implementation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||