dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_audit_and_provenance_plane

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_audit_and_provenance_plane [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:logical_audit_and_provenance_plane [2026/08/04 07:09] (current) – ↷ Links adapted because of a move operation nick_dido
Line 1: Line 1:
 +====== Logical Audit and Provenance Plane ======
  
 +[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:start|Go up to Terms and Definitions]]
 +
 +===== Discussion =====
 +
 +The Logical Audit and Provenance Plane supports reconstruction, accountability, lineage, review, replay, recovery, auditability, and defensibility for FX logical processing.
 +
 +Logical Audit and Provenance Plane interactions record or relate what happened, when it happened, which FX logical [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:f:financial_node|Nodes]] participated, which information served as input, which rules or versions the system applied, which decisions the system made, and how outputs relate to inputs.
 +
 +The Logical Audit and Provenance Plane preserves relationships among FX Transaction Candidates, FX Transaction Records, FX Validation Results, FX Semantic Assertions, FX Contract States, FX Cash-Flow Obligations, FX Policy Decisions, FX Release Packages, FX Audit Records, FX Provenance Records, FX Replay Requests, FX Replay Results, FX logical Nodes, FX endpoints, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:e:evidence|Evidence]] expectations.
 +
 +===== Definition =====
 +
 +//[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:r:runtime_plane|Runtime Plane]] supporting [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:audit|Audit]], [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:p:provenance|Provenance]], lineage, reconstruction, replay, and defensibility//
 +
 +===== Source =====
 +
 +Specialization of Logical Audit and Provenance Plane from [[fxdemo:02-part:start]], Section 9.6, and [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:audit_and_provenance_plane|Audit and Provenance Plane]] from [[fxdemo:01-part:start]], Section 8.6; generalised from FX audit, provenance, persistence, replay, reconstruction, and evidence-support material in the original FX Demo [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:r:reference_architecture|Reference Architecture]].
 +
 +===== Note =====
 +
 +The Logical Audit and Provenance Plane is not merely logging. Logs contribute to [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:audit|Audit]] or [[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:p:provenance|Provenance]] only when the implementation and evidence layers preserve traceable information that supports reconstruction, review, or evidence.
 +
 +===== Example =====
 +
 +An FX Provenance Record links an FX Cash-Flow Obligation to the FX Contract State, FX Semantic Assertion, calculation context, model version, producing FX logical Node, and timestamp.
 +
 +----
 +
 +[[dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:l:start|Return to Top]]
 +
 +----
 +
 +<WRAP centeralign>
 +
 +© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.
 +
 +</WRAP>