Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:f:fdis-ra [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:f:fdis-ra [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Federated Data Interpretation Systems Reference Architecture (FDIS-RA) ====== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Federated Data Interpretation Systems Reference Architecture (FDIS-RA) defines a common architectural framework for systems that interpret, validate, compare, and govern data produced through statutory, regulatory, administrative, | ||
| + | |||
| + | FDIS-RA addresses environments in which multiple organizations, | ||
| + | |||
| + | FDIS-RA defines architectural responsibilities for: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Evidence intake and custody | ||
| + | * Information extraction and observation generation | ||
| + | * Observation and metadata management | ||
| + | * Semantic canonicalisation | ||
| + | * Interpretation, | ||
| + | * Validation, conformance, | ||
| + | * Analysis, reporting, and user interaction | ||
| + | * Interface and contract governance | ||
| + | * Semantic version and context management | ||
| + | * Monitoring, signals, and indicators | ||
| + | |||
| + | FDIS-RA separates operational processing within the data plane from governance, configuration, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Financial Data Transparency Act (FDTA) provides a representative motivating case. FDIS-RA does not derive its applicability solely from the FDTA and does not replace agency-specific rules, reporting requirements, | ||
| + | |||
| + | FDIS-RA serves as the proposed response to the Structured Information Processing Reference Architecture (SIP-RA) Request for Proposal. It applies the architectural separation of data, structure, semantics, and interpretation required by SIP-RA to federated data interpretation environments. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | // | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Federated Data Interpretation Systems Reference Architecture | ||
| + | * Structured Information Processing Reference Architecture Request for Proposal | ||
| + | * Dido Solutions and Jackrabbit Consulting, 2026 | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * FDIS-RA does not prescribe a particular ontology language, rule engine, database, artificial intelligence model, transport protocol, product, platform, deployment topology, or vendor implementation. | ||
| + | * A system does not conform to FDIS-RA merely because it uses a technology or standard mentioned by the architecture. Conformance depends on satisfaction of the applicable architectural responsibilities, | ||
| + | * The expansion of FDIS is **Federated Data Interpretation Systems**. The plural word **Systems** reflects applicability across multiple systems and does not require a particular deployment to contain multiple independently deployed software systems. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A regulator may apply FDIS-RA when acquiring an environment that preserves source filings, extracts observations with provenance, interprets those observations under versioned semantic definitions and rules, validates the results, and exposes traceable outcomes across governed interfaces. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||