Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision | |||
| dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:d:digital_twin [2026/08/19 18:36] – nick_dido | dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:d:digital_twin [2026/08/19 18:51] (current) – nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| ===== Discussion ===== | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| - | A Digital Twin provides a digital representation of a referent whose relevant state, behavior, configuration, | + | A Digital Twin provides a digital representation of a referent whose relevant state, behavior, |
| - | The referent may be a physical asset, software component, process, system, or other identifiable subject. The relationship between the referent and its Digital Twin may support | + | The referent may be a physical asset, software component, process, system, or other identifiable subject. The relationship between the referent and its Digital Twin supports |
| - | The DIDO Reference Architecture describes a Digital Twin in terms of a real-world item, a software representation, | + | The DIDO Reference Architecture describes a Digital Twin in terms of a real-world item, a software representation, |
| - | Within DIDO Solutions architectures, | + | Within DIDO Solutions architectures, |
| ===== Definition ===== | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ===== Source ===== | ===== Source ===== | ||
| - | * [[https:// | + | * [[dido:03-dido-te:99-annexes:annex-b-references:dte-009|[DTE9]]], Appendix A, //Digital Twin// |
| * DIDO Solutions normalization of the DIDO Reference Architecture concept for physical, virtual, logical, and software-defined referents | * DIDO Solutions normalization of the DIDO Reference Architecture concept for physical, virtual, logical, and software-defined referents | ||
| ===== Note ===== | ===== Note ===== | ||
| - | A Digital Twin does not require every characteristic of the referent | + | A Digital Twin does not require |
| - | A Digital Twin also does not imply bidirectional control. Observation, | + | A Digital Twin does not imply bidirectional control. Observation, |
| + | |||
| + | The data relating a Digital Twin to its referent forms part of the twin relationship. Communication mechanisms transport this data but do not, by themselves, establish its semantic meaning, authority, or required fidelity. | ||
| ===== Example ===== | ===== Example ===== | ||
| - | A Digital Twin of a deployed service | + | A Digital Twin of a deployed service |
| ---- | ---- | ||