Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:auditability [2026/07/12 23:41] – created nick_didodido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:auditability [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1
Line 9: Line 9:
 In regulated data interpretation environments, auditability depends on preserved evidence, explicit provenance, traceable relationships, versioned semantic and rule context, identifiable actors or components, and recorded processing history. In regulated data interpretation environments, auditability depends on preserved evidence, explicit provenance, traceable relationships, versioned semantic and rule context, identifiable actors or components, and recorded processing history.
  
-An auditable system enables an authorised reviewer to determine:+An auditable system enables an authorized reviewer to determine:
  
   * What information was entered into the system   * What information was entered into the system
Line 23: Line 23:
 ===== Definition ===== ===== Definition =====
  
-//quality of a system, process, or result that permits authorised inspection, reconstruction, evaluation, and explanation.//+//quality permitting inspection and reconstruction//
  
 ===== Source ===== ===== Source =====
Line 39: Line 39:
 ===== Example ===== ===== Example =====
  
-A reporting system is auditable when an authorised reviewer can reconstruct how a reported value was extracted, interpreted, validated, changed, and approved using preserved evidence and governed processing records.+A reporting system is auditable when an authorized reviewer can reconstruct how a reported value was extracted, interpreted, validated, changed, and approved using preserved evidence and governed processing records.
  
 ---- ----
  • dido/99_annexes/annex-b-terms-and-definitions/a/auditability.1783924917.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2026/07/12 23:41
  • by nick_dido