Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:audit_and_provenance_plane [2026/07/11 11:14] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:99_annexes:annex-b-terms-and-definitions:a:audit_and_provenance_plane [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== Audit And Provenance Plane ====== | ||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Audit and Provenance Plane supports reconstruction, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Audit and Provenance Plane helps the architecture support review, replay, recovery, evidence, conformance assessment, and long-term governance. It preserves relationships among Data Structure Instances, Nodes, Communication Endpoints, policy decisions, analytical outputs, and evidence. | ||
| + | |||
| + | A later implementation profile may realize Audit and Provenance Plane interactions through audit topics, provenance records, event stores, immutable logs, evidence packages, lineage graphs, release audit records, or replay records. Those mechanisms do not redefine the Audit and Provenance Plane. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //Runtime Plane supporting auditability, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Adapted from FX Demo Reference Architecture, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The Audit and Provenance Plane is not merely logging. Logs may contribute to audit or provenance by preserving traceable information that supports reconstruction, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | A provenance record linking an analytical assertion to its input data, producing Node, model version, timestamp, and calculation run, may belong to the Audit and Provenance Plane. | ||