Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:05-semantics:01-kinds-of-semantics:08-owl-semantics [2026/07/08 03:02] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:05-semantics:01-kinds-of-semantics:08-owl-semantics [2026/07/18 12:33] (current) – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== OWL Semantics ====== | ||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Discussion ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL semantics defines meaning through [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL, the Web Ontology Language, provides an [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL semantics differs from [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL semantics also differs from [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL semantic content includes: | ||
| + | |||
| + | * Classes | ||
| + | * Object properties | ||
| + | * Data properties | ||
| + | * Individuals | ||
| + | * Axioms | ||
| + | * Class expressions | ||
| + | * Property restrictions | ||
| + | * Equivalence assertions | ||
| + | * Disjointness assertions | ||
| + | * Subclass relationships | ||
| + | * Domain and range assertions | ||
| + | * Cardinality restrictions | ||
| + | * Individual assertions | ||
| + | * Consistency conditions | ||
| + | * Inference commitments | ||
| + | * Reasoner-derived classifications | ||
| + | |||
| + | A governed architecture preserves [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Definition ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | //meaning defined through OWL ontology constructs, axioms, assertions, class expressions, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | DIDO Solutions usage is informed by W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL), OWL semantics, ontology engineering practice, semantic modeling practice, and model-driven architecture principles. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Note ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL semantics does not define all semantics. OWL semantics defines the formal interpretation of OWL expressions. Domain meaning remains governed by the conceptual model, ontology commitments, | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL reasoning derives consequences from OWL axioms under OWL semantics. OWL reasoning does not replace business judgment, policy interpretation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Example ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | An FX OWL ontology expresses selected ontology content using OWL classes, properties, and axioms. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ^ OWL content ^ OWL semantic meaning ^ | ||
| + | | '' | ||
| + | | '' | ||
| + | | '' | ||
| + | | '' | ||
| + | | '' | ||
| + | | '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | OWL semantics supports formal processing of these expressions. For example, when '' | ||
| + | |||
| + | This inference expresses OWL semantics. The business meaning of confirmation still comes from the FX conceptual model, lifecycle rules, validation rules, and governance context. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||