Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| dido:03-dido-te:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:03-functional-requirements:03-03-twin-node-requirements:twin-009-control-twin-interaction:twin-009e-reject-prohibited-twin-interactions [2026/08/22 14:22] – removed - external edit (Unknown date) 127.0.0.1 | dido:03-dido-te:99-annexes:annex-c-requirements:03-functional-requirements:03-03-twin-node-requirements:twin-009-control-twin-interaction:twin-009e-reject-prohibited-twin-interactions [2026/08/22 14:27] (current) – nick_dido | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ====== TWIN-009e — Reject Prohibited Twin Interactions ====== | ||
| + | [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statement ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | The [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Source ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Rationale ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | TWIN-009a identifies the interactions permitted within a [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | An interaction that is not identified as permitted falls outside the interaction boundary established by the governing [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rejecting such an interaction prevents technical connectivity, | ||
| + | |||
| + | This requirement remains distinct from TWIN-009d. TWIN-009d governs an unauthorized interaction that attempts to change Resource state. TWIN-009e governs an interaction that is not permitted. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Applies To ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | * [[dido: | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Verification ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Verification confirms that: | ||
| + | |||
| + | - An interaction identified as permitted is distinguishable from an interaction not identified as permitted. | ||
| + | - An interaction not identified as permitted is rejected. | ||
| + | - Technical connectivity does not cause an unpermitted interaction to be accepted. | ||
| + | - DDS discovery, Topic matching, interface availability, | ||
| + | - Rejection is traceable to the attempted interaction and the governing Configuration. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Verification includes one interaction identified as permitted and one technically possible interaction not identified as permitted and confirms rejection of the latter. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Traceability ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{backlinks> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== ConOps Relationship ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | This requirement enforces the interaction boundary established by TWIN-009a by rejecting interactions outside the permitted interaction set. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Delivery Phase ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | TBD | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Requirement Status ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Draft | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===== Statement Reference ===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | <code dokuwiki> | ||
| + | {{section> | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | <WRAP centeralign> | ||
| + | © 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc. | ||
| + | </ | ||