An Authorizing Authority holds the assigned responsibility and authority to evaluate risk and issue, deny, restrict, suspend, or withdraw an Operational Approval for a defined system, service, facility, organization, or operational capability.
The Authorizing Authority considers applicable requirements, implemented controls, assessment results, identified risks, operating conditions, and supporting Evidence. The authority records the resulting decision and any associated conditions, restrictions, or period of applicability.
An Authorizing Authority may represent an individual, organizational role, committee, public body, contractual authority, or other governance body with formally assigned decision authority.
Crucible produces controlled artifacts and evidence that support evaluation. Crucible does not act as the Authorizing Authority.
individual, role, organization, or governance body with assigned authority to evaluate risk and issue, deny, restrict, suspend, or withdraw an operational approval
Generalised from security-authorization, accreditation, governance, and risk-management usage and specialized for the Crucible architecture and operational model.
The title, legal authority, jurisdiction, and decision process associated with an Authorizing Authority vary among organizations and regulatory regimes.
An assessor, auditor, compliance officer, or evidence producer does not become an Authorizing Authority solely by performing an assessment or preparing evidence.
A designated governance body reviews the assessment results, residual risks, operating procedures, and compliance evidence for a Software Factory. The governance body acts as the Authorizing Authority when it issues the factory’s Operational Approval.
© 2026 Dido Solutions, Inc. and Jackrabbit Consulting, Inc.